data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f9f3/6f9f318dc83d841446b50eddef8126c35153a239" alt=""
I wasn't sure what to post this week and then I just read
this post at Niamh's about breaking all the damned rules (OK, they call them 'tips from last year's judges' – see
here) that the (UK/London-based) Poetry Society have put up for their poetry competition this year. Can I just say one word..? And can that word be
wankers (though actually I quite like some poems by Neil Rollinson, one of aforementioned judges...haven't read any Daljit Nagra...seems like a nice bloke...but Ruth Padel, I mean, after the recent Oxford mash-up...is she really in the tip-giving category...?). They actually use the phrase 'lower the tone of your entry' in amongst these tips which leaves me almost wordless. I did say 'almost'. And who am I anyway...so obscure.
But it's totally not about the personalities involved here... it's more about the rules/tips/hints mentality that has infected poetry over recent years and would smother it with good intentions, I think, if it could. I even know and like some poetry folk who send out lists of rules and tips (you know who you are...) but I really don't like that side of them and I wish they wouldn't do it. I mean if someone wants to send an entry to the National Poetry Competition on multi-coloured paper, handwritten in crayon and scented all over with eau de KFC what the hell does it matter to anyone else? Doesn't the entry money help keep the place running? Doesn't the unexpected approach keep things interesting and not totally predictable? Are judges so bland and dull that everything must be presented perfectly for them (and if possible using only those nice, long words, please)? Do they really think that the kind of person who sends in an entry on green paper with pink spots is going to change and blandify their life just because they're told to by (gasp) a successful poet? This person may not be successful (dreadful, I know) but do you know what they just might be? How about a free spirit or an eccentric genius or perhaps even just a daft loser on some very heavy medication...and what the hell does it matter anyway because whichever they are they're almost certainly not going to be a person who follows rule (or tip) lists (and I'll tell you that for nothing... telling them what to do will probably make them more extreme in their weirdness if anything...). And don't the judges wonder what it says about them that they even think that a list of hints can do anything to change this (might it show a poor understanding of the human psyche, for example)? Might someone write a poem about that?
For me the endless rule-making and hint-proffering leads to this world (please stand and salute - that or die lonely and unpublished):
Poets and wannabe poets, you will go to workshops! Only there can you see the true path.Yes, generals. (sorry about italics, judge people).
You will care far too much about the academic viewpoint! Ordinary readers are not important. I repeat, ordinary readers are NOT important! Yes, generals.You will be obssessed with competitions, literary magazines and all-round toadying to famous poets in the hope that some of it might rub off and you might enter the inner scrotum...sorry sanctum and become...(intake of breath)...a workshop facilitator yourself! (sigh).Yes, generals.You will obey poetry rules at all times! Otherwise you only have yourself to blame for your sad and meaningless existence.Yes, generals.
You will never mention the Beat Poets and any other layabouts who broke rules and still managed to scrape by (they are forgotten/evil/work of the devil)!Yes, generals.Women poets especially beware – you're only really allowed in to Poetry World on a special pass and privileges can be removed at any time!(In high voices)
Yes, generals.I could go on with this for weeks...but really, it's the holidays and I have books to read and housework to ignore. Also I am aware that this is the kind of thing that gets blogs a bad name (and I'm usually so well-behaved!). I don't have a poem about poetry competitions in particular...but I do have this one about sending poems to poetry magazines and it covers some of the same ground we're dancing on here. It's from a few years ago (and I don't always feel like this but I do now and then). So bitter.
We enjoyed these but…Could you make them more obscure
Metaphors more, funny bits fewer?
And could you make them long and boring?
Our aim in life is to get folk snoring
Perhaps you could take out all that's real
Honesty, directness, popular appeal
Could you rewrite them in language poetic?
Get out that dictionary, don't be pathetic
You should read our stuff and see what we like
Something more like that, that's what to write
You see we want everyone writing the same
The poetry business, a funny old game
RF 2005
And yet really, I'm quite mellow you know.
x